Le rapport sur la qualité et la plausibilité des données est un outil essentiel pour évaluer la fiabilité et la précision de la collecte des données de l”IPHRA dans différents secteurs tels que la nutrition, la mortalité, l eau, l assainissement et l hygiène (WASH), la sécurité alimentaire et les moyens de subsistance. Cette analyse complète est conçue pour identifier et traiter les problèmes potentiels dans les données, en veillant à ce que les équipes de terrain soient informées des problèmes potentiels détectés dans la collecte de données.
Pour chacun de ces secteurs, le rapport fournit un examen détaillé des ensembles de données, en utilisant une variété de mesures et de méthodologies pour évaluer la qualité et la plausibilité des données. Il s agit notamment de vérifier l exhaustivité, la cohérence et l exactitude des données collectées. Ce rapport vise à mettre en évidence les divergences, les valeurs aberrantes ou les anomalies qui peuvent suggérer une collecte de données, des erreurs de saisie ou des problèmes sous-jacents susceptibles d avoir une incidence sur l intégrité des résultats.
Cette section présente un résumé de certains résultats clés ainsi que des vérifications de métadonnées telles que le nombreUUID doublons, valeurs aberrantes dans les durées d enquête/doublons légers, incohérences entre les listes des individuel et les principaux ensembles de données de menage, et quelques diagrammes de distribution des âges.
Cette section comprend également une carte qui montre les emplacements géographiques des ménages évalués.
Cette section comprend:
Cette section comprend:
Cette section comprend:
Cette section comprend:
Veuillez vérifier chaque indicateur et l ACTION qui s y rapporte et agir en conséquence.
Un autre résultat sera associé à ce HTML, le fichier Excel des drapeaux qui ont été tirés et qui nécessitent un suivi avec l équipe de terrain. Veuillez consulter l onglet README dans le fichier Excel. Ce fichier sera à nouveau généré avec l ensemble des données lors du nettoyage de l ensemble des données. Veuillez donc utiliser ce fichier pendant la collecte des données et vous y référer dans le fichier final à remplir.
Vous pouvez nous faire part de vos commentaires sur les améliorations à apporter à ce produit en nous contactant :
## <h5>Number of detected inconsistency between main and water_count_loop:<strong> 0</strong></h5>
## <h5>Number of detected inconsistency between main and women:<strong> 1</strong></h5>
## <h5>Number of detected inconsistency between main and died_member:<strong> 0</strong></h5>
Values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score | Indicator Score | ||
plaus_flag_sd_foodgroup | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 19/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_fcs | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
plaus_flag_meat_cereal_ratio | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_sugar_cond_hdds | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_sd_rcsicoping | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_rcsi | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_rcsi | <1% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >=5% | 0 | |||
0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_protein_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_rcsi_children | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_severe_hhs | <1% | <5% | <10% | >=10% | 6 | 6/10 | ||
0 | 6 | 8 | 10 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_coherence | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 7 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 5 | 5 | 7 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_na | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_severity | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 5 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_livestock | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_agriculture | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_prop_fc_flags | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | 16/20 | ||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_corr.fcs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 5 | |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
plaus_corr.fcs_hhs | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 3 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_corr.hhs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 0 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_flag_fcsrcsi_box | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_fcs_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 1 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_fsl_score | <20 | 20 < 30 | >= 30 | 65 | ||||
plaus_fsl_cat | Good | Moderate | Problematic | Problematic | ||||
Values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score | Indicator Score | ||
plaus_flag_sd_foodgroup | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 16/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_fcs | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 1 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
plaus_flag_meat_cereal_ratio | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_sugar_cond_hdds | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_sd_rcsicoping | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 10/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_rcsi | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_rcsi | <1% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >=5% | 0 | |||
0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_protein_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_rcsi_children | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_severe_hhs | <1% | <5% | <10% | >=10% | 6 | 6/10 | ||
0 | 6 | 8 | 10 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_coherence | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 7 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 5 | 5 | 7 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_na | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_severity | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 5 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_livestock | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_agriculture | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_prop_fc_flags | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | 11.5/20 | ||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_corr.fcs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 2 | |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
plaus_corr.fcs_hhs | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 1.5 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_corr.hhs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 0 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_flag_fcsrcsi_box | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_fcs_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 1 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_fsl_score | <20 | 20 < 30 | >= 30 | 55.5 | ||||
plaus_fsl_cat | Good | Moderate | Problematic | Problematic | ||||
Values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score | Indicator Score | ||
plaus_flag_sd_foodgroup | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 17/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_fcs | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
plaus_flag_meat_cereal_ratio | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_sugar_cond_hdds | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_sd_rcsicoping | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 16/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_rcsi | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_rcsi | <1% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >=5% | 4 | |||
0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_protein_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_rcsi_children | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_severe_hhs | <1% | <5% | <10% | >=10% | 6 | 6/10 | ||
0 | 6 | 8 | 10 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_coherence | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 7 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 5 | 5 | 7 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_na | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_severity | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 5 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_livestock | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_agriculture | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_prop_fc_flags | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | 16/20 | ||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_corr.fcs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 5 | |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
plaus_corr.fcs_hhs | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 3 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_corr.hhs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 0 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_flag_fcsrcsi_box | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_fcs_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 1 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_fsl_score | <20 | 20 < 30 | >= 30 | 67 | ||||
plaus_fsl_cat | Good | Moderate | Problematic | Problematic | ||||
Values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score | Indicator Score | ||
plaus_flag_sd_foodgroup | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 19/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_fcs | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
plaus_flag_meat_cereal_ratio | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_sugar_cond_hdds | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_sd_rcsicoping | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_rcsi | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_rcsi | <1% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >=5% | 0 | |||
0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_protein_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_rcsi_children | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_severe_hhs | <1% | <5% | <10% | >=10% | 6 | 6/10 | ||
0 | 6 | 8 | 10 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_coherence | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 7 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 5 | 5 | 7 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_na | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_severity | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 5 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_livestock | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_agriculture | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_prop_fc_flags | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | 10.5/20 | ||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_corr.fcs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 2 | |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
plaus_corr.fcs_hhs | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 1.5 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_corr.hhs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 0 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_flag_fcsrcsi_box | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_fcs_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_fsl_score | <20 | 20 < 30 | >= 30 | 59.5 | ||||
plaus_fsl_cat | Good | Moderate | Problematic | Problematic | ||||
Values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score | Indicator Score | ||
plaus_flag_sd_foodgroup | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 19/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_fcs | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
plaus_flag_meat_cereal_ratio | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_sugar_cond_hdds | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_sd_rcsicoping | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_rcsi | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_rcsi | <1% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >=5% | 0 | |||
0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_protein_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_rcsi_children | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_severe_hhs | <1% | <5% | <10% | >=10% | 6 | 6/10 | ||
0 | 6 | 8 | 10 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_coherence | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 7 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 5 | 5 | 7 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_na | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_severity | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 5 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_livestock | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_agriculture | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_prop_fc_flags | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | 16/20 | ||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_corr.fcs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 5 | |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
plaus_corr.fcs_hhs | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 3 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_corr.hhs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 0 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_flag_fcsrcsi_box | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_fcs_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 1 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_fsl_score | <20 | 20 < 30 | >= 30 | 65 | ||||
plaus_fsl_cat | Good | Moderate | Problematic | Problematic | ||||
Values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score | Indicator Score | ||
plaus_flag_sd_foodgroup | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 17/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_fcs | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd >= 8-<9 or sd >= 14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_fcs | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 2 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
plaus_flag_meat_cereal_ratio | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_low_sugar_cond_hdds | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_flag_sd_rcsicoping | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 6 | 16/20 | ||
0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | |||||
plaus_sd_rcsi | sd >=9 or <14 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd >=8-<9 or sd >=14 - <16 | sd <8 or >=16 | 0 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_high_rcsi | <1% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >=5% | 4 | |||
0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_protein_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_rcsi_children | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_severe_hhs | <1% | <5% | <10% | >=10% | 6 | 6/10 | ||
0 | 6 | 8 | 10 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_coherence | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 7 | 12/20 | ||
0 | 5 | 5 | 7 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_na | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 0 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_severity | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 5 | |||
0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_livestock | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_lcsi_liv_agriculture | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | NA | |||
0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |||||
plaus_prop_fc_flags | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 4 | 16/20 | ||
0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
plaus_corr.fcs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 5 | |
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
plaus_corr.fcs_hhs | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 3 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_corr.hhs_rcsi | R2 < -0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 < -0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value >=0.05 | R2 >= -0.2 & R2 <= 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value >= 0.05 | R2 > 0.2 & p-value <0.05 | 0 | |
0 | 1 | 1.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | |||
plaus_flag_fcsrcsi_box | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 3 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_flag_fcs_rcsi | <2% | 2-<10% | 2-<10% | >10% | 1 | |||
0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
plaus_fsl_score | <20 | 20 < 30 | >= 30 | 67 | ||||
plaus_fsl_cat | Good | Moderate | Problematic | Problematic | ||||
Rational: Any time protein consumption is higher than cereal consumption. In most diets, cereal consumption remains the main food group, also usually cheaper than meat and would be higher than protein consumption. Exceptions could be observed in certain contexts including for pastoral HHs relying on different sources of food.
Action: If cereal consumption is low, but meat consumption is high, data should be reviewed for coherence according to food source and livelihood system.
Rational: In many contexty, types of fat are commonly used for meal preparation, along with cereals as basic staples.
Action: If reported consumption is low, review according to food sources and livelihoods sytems for coherence.
Rational: In many contexty, types of fat are commonly used for meal preparation, along with cereals as basic staples. If reported consumption is low
Action: If reported consumption is low, review according to food sources and livelihoods sytems for coherence.
Rational: Except if in EXTREME cases (e.g. Somalia), it will be very rare for many/any HHs to have such low FCS scores
Action: Review with enumerators if corresponds to observed vulneraiblity of households and flag to PHU
Rational: FCS total score is 112 which corresponds to consuming all food groups every day, highly unlikely in any context. WFP set threshold starting from 56 considered already has high. To be reviewed against context for coherence.
Action: Review with enumerators if corresponds to observed vulneraiblity of households
Rational:
Action:
Rational: If rCSI score is high (in contexts of early crisis stages) while protein consumption is also reported as frequent ( min. 5 days), it could be that either dimension wasn’t understood or collected properly.
Action: Review with enumerators teams if consumption-based coping were really applied because of lack of food, and/or well understood (review frequency) AND/OR review which protein are mainly reported: meat, chicken or eggs? Depending on the livelihood system or market prices, high protein consumption could be explained but if not (HH doesn’t appear to own livestock for instance), remove rCSI entry if other food groups are also frequently consumed in line with local dietary patterns.
Rational: FCS and rCSI are strongly correlated with a negative relation. This combination is’t impossible but needs to be verified within its context. If collected in early stages of a crisis, would be expected that rCSI will still be sensitive enough to measure early consumption-based coping and measure a higher score.
Action: Review based on context and crisis stage, whether not engaging in consumption-based coping would be linked to exhaustion of these strategies (in a protracted context) or to issues in collecting this data in the correct way.
Rational: Semi-official threshold tested by IPC AFI for potential cut-off of rCSI score indicative of IPC AFI phase 4.
Action: If large % of HHs score rCSI above 43, review if relevant within a protracted or new crisis. Cut-off can then be applied for analysis and results presentation.
Rational: Any HH that would have an acceptable FCS score (higher scores) and a high rCSI score is most likely indicative of data quality issue with one or both indicators
Action: Review both FCS and rCSI entries with concerned enumerators
Rational: Script calculates ‘sd_rcsicoping’ measuring the standard deviation among consumption based coping entries. If sd_rcsicoping is lower than 0.8, high descripencies among the rCSI entry should be flagged. Repetitive entry (5,4,5,4,5,…), all high (rcsi = 56) or all low (rcsi = 0) entries should be reviewed for enumerator bias.
Action: If lower than 0.8, review for enumerator bias
Rational: reports of severe and very severe hunger are flags for particularly At Risk Households suffering from prolonged acute food insecurity
Action: Flag to PHU team
Rational: HHs report using crisis or emergency strategies but not stress strategies (not even exhausted). Emergency and no crisis (NA included). Livelihood coping isn’t linear but to check for coherence among severity of strategies used and exhausted
Action: If no stress level stragies are either exhausted or applied (‘yes’), but crisis or emergency are, (same scenario if no crisis strategies are applied or exhausted). Either strategies selected aren’t context appropriate or review enumerators understanding of module. Whole LCSI module will most likely be considered as non-informative.
Rational: If a high % of HHs report employing emergency level livelihoods coping strategies, severe sign of food consumption (or wider basic needs) gaps
Action: Flag to PHU team
Rational: According to the fewsnet matrix cells and combination they reflect between FCS score, rCSI score and HHS score about 6 combinations would indicate non logical situation where FCS score is acceptable and rCSI is low but HHS score is moderate to very severe. Doesn’t include LCSI.
Action: Review entries for HHs with flag to identify incoherence among outcomes indicators results.
Rational: If low HDDS score but only because sugar and condiments ar reported would be a sign of high severity and high food consumption gaps.
Action: NA
##
##
## #### FCS/RCSI/HHS Correlation Plot
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_ageratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_sexratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_dps_muac | < 8 | < 13 | < 20 | >= 20 | 2 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_perc_mfaz_children | < 1% | < 3% | < 5% | >= 5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_n_children_muac | > 100 | > 80 | > 50 | <= 50 | 0 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_sd_muac_mm | < 12 | < 14 | < 15 | >= 15 | 10 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_anthro_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 12 |
plaus_anthro_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Good |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_ageratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_sexratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_dps_muac | < 8 | < 13 | < 20 | >= 20 | 4 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_perc_mfaz_children | < 1% | < 3% | < 5% | >= 5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_n_children_muac | > 100 | > 80 | > 50 | <= 50 | 10 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_sd_muac_mm | < 12 | < 14 | < 15 | >= 15 | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_anthro_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 14 |
plaus_anthro_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Good |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_ageratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_sexratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_dps_muac | < 8 | < 13 | < 20 | >= 20 | 10 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_perc_mfaz_children | < 1% | < 3% | < 5% | >= 5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_n_children_muac | > 100 | > 80 | > 50 | <= 50 | 10 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_sd_muac_mm | < 12 | < 14 | < 15 | >= 15 | 20 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_anthro_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 40 |
plaus_anthro_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Problematic |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_ageratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_sexratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_dps_muac | < 8 | < 13 | < 20 | >= 20 | 10 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_perc_mfaz_children | < 1% | < 3% | < 5% | >= 5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_n_children_muac | > 100 | > 80 | > 50 | <= 50 | 10 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_sd_muac_mm | < 12 | < 14 | < 15 | >= 15 | 5 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_anthro_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 25 |
plaus_anthro_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Problematic |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_ageratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_sexratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_dps_muac | < 8 | < 13 | < 20 | >= 20 | 4 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_perc_mfaz_children | < 1% | < 3% | < 5% | >= 5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_n_children_muac | > 100 | > 80 | > 50 | <= 50 | 10 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_sd_muac_mm | < 12 | < 14 | < 15 | >= 15 | 20 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_anthro_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 34 |
plaus_anthro_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Problematic |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_ageratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_sexratio | p-value > 0.1 | p-value > 0.05 | p-value > 0.001 | p-value < 0.001 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_dps_muac | < 8 | < 13 | < 20 | >= 20 | 10 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_perc_mfaz_children | < 1% | < 3% | < 5% | >= 5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_n_children_muac | > 100 | > 80 | > 50 | <= 50 | 10 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_sd_muac_mm | < 12 | < 14 | < 15 | >= 15 | 10 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_anthro_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 30 |
plaus_anthro_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Problematic |
Rational: MUAC-for-age z-scores where the value is greater than +/- 3 from the mean MUAC-for-age z-scores
Action: Data will be automatically cleaned, but please do check with Enumerator.
Rational: MUAC < 7cm or > 22cm
Action: Data will be automatically cleaned, but please do check with Enumerator.
Rational: Oedema cases reported “yes”
Action: Manual review and follow-up with team needed to confirm.
Rational: Liters per person per day is greater than +/- 3 from the mean liters per person per day.
Action: Data will be automatically cleaned, but please do check with Enumerator.
Rational: Liters per person per day is <1
Action: Data will be automatically cleaned, but please do check with Enumerator.
Rational: Liters per person per day is > 50
Action: Data will be automatically cleaned, but please do check with Enumerator.
Rational: High numbers of containers > 20 (per HH)
Action: Data will be automatically cleaned, but please do check with Enumerator.
Rational: No containers for households where water is not on the premises.
Action: Please follow up with Enumerator
Rational: Water is on the premises but water collection time is not immediate.
Action: Data will be automatically cleaned, but please do check with Enumerator.
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_overall_cdr | <1 | <2 | <3.5 | >=3.5 | 5 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_hh_multiple_death | <0.5% | 0.5 - <1% | 1 - <1.5% | >=1.5% | 10 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_sex_ratio | >0.05 | >0.001 | > 0.001 | <= 0.0001 | 0 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5plus_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to1_2to4_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5to10_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_mort_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 30 |
plaus_mort_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Problematic |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_overall_cdr | <1 | <2 | <3.5 | >=3.5 | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_hh_multiple_death | <0.5% | 0.5 - <1% | 1 - <1.5% | >=1.5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_sex_ratio | >0.05 | >0.001 | > 0.001 | <= 0.0001 | 0 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5plus_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to1_2to4_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5to10_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_mort_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 3 |
plaus_mort_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Excellent |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_overall_cdr | <1 | <2 | <3.5 | >=3.5 | 5 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_hh_multiple_death | <0.5% | 0.5 - <1% | 1 - <1.5% | >=1.5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_sex_ratio | >0.05 | >0.001 | > 0.001 | <= 0.0001 | 0 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5plus_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 3 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to1_2to4_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 3 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5to10_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 3 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_mort_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 14 |
plaus_mort_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Good |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_overall_cdr | <1 | <2 | <3.5 | >=3.5 | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_hh_multiple_death | <0.5% | 0.5 - <1% | 1 - <1.5% | >=1.5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_sex_ratio | >0.05 | >0.001 | > 0.001 | <= 0.0001 | 0 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5plus_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to1_2to4_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5to10_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 1 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_mort_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 3 |
plaus_mort_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Excellent |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_overall_cdr | <1 | <2 | <3.5 | >=3.5 | 10 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_hh_multiple_death | <0.5% | 0.5 - <1% | 1 - <1.5% | >=1.5% | 20 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_sex_ratio | >0.05 | >0.001 | > 0.001 | <= 0.0001 | 0 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5plus_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to1_2to4_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5to10_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_mort_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 45 |
plaus_mort_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Problematic |
Values | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
flag_name | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Score |
plaus_overall_cdr | <1 | <2 | <3.5 | >=3.5 | 5 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_hh_multiple_death | <0.5% | 0.5 - <1% | 1 - <1.5% | >=1.5% | 0 |
0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | ||
plaus_sex_ratio | >0.05 | >0.001 | > 0.001 | <= 0.0001 | 0 |
0 | 2 | 4 | 10 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5plus_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to1_2to4_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_age0to4_5to10_ratio | >0.1 | >0.05 | >0.001 | <= 0.001 | 5 |
0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | ||
plaus_mort_score | <10 | 10 < 20 | 20 < 25 | >= 25 | 20 |
plaus_mort_cat | Excellent | Good | Acceptable | Problematic | Acceptable |
Rational: Respondent reported more than 2 death in the HH
Action: Please follow up with Enumerator
Rational: Respondent reported sex of dead person male and a cause of death related to female only.
Action: Please follow up with Enumerator